4 October 2006

The Creation and This Particular Creation

Filed under: Ktismata — ktismatics @ 4:17 am

This one scientific study, this one business, this one war, this one church: each individual creation is simultaneously a part of a larger reality and a separate reality in its own right. How does the reality of the larger category of Science, Business, War, Church shape the way you create this particular instantiation?

Say I want to write a novel. All the novels ever written comprise the larger reality of The Novel. There are abstract properties that apply to most novels: they are fictional, they are written by one person, they’re pretty long, there are characters, there are stories involving the characters. There are novel-writing skills: good writing technique, imagination, character development, dialogue. There are subcategories of novels, the “genres” of fiction: science fiction, romance, inspirational, literary. Then there is the environment where novels “live”: publishers, bookstores, the reading public. There’s what the customers want out of a novel: characters they can relate to, some sex and violence, snappy dialogue, straighforward story development.

Then there is my novel. A man is sitting at an outdoor café table. It’s southern France. It’s raining, late afternoon. He’s sitting by himself, drinking a beer. Just like every afternoon. He’s distracted, lost in thought – he’s just heard disturbing news from a distant friend. After a while he realizes that there’s a woman standing across from him, greeting him by name. She extends her hand…

This is the reality as it exists inside this particular novel, a novel that isn’t even written yet, a reality that’s being summoned into existence out of the formless void of the individual imagination. I’ve read plenty of novels, I’ve worked on my skills: now I’m writing this novel, creating this one idiosyncratic creation. I’m totally immersed in this emerging reality that’s taking shape around me. To me as I write there are no other novels: there’s only this one.

Say I’ve finished writing the novel. There it sits in the agent’s slush pile, one manuscript among hundreds, thousands, millions. What’s distinguishes mine from the rest? Perhaps nothing: it’s a product of the novel-writing industry. It’s a cottage industry comprised of hundreds of thousands of individual practitioners working in relative isolation. From forty thousand feet my novel is identical to every other novel.

I can approach the work of writing a novel in one of two ways. I can think about where my novel sits in the larger reality of The Novel: the component parts, the skills, the genres, the market. I want to make my novel enough like everyone else’s so that it’s attractive to the publishing industry and the reading public, but different enough that it stands out from the competition. Or I can think about the guy getting up from his café table to greet the woman. Does he kiss her extended hand, shake it, grasp it tenderly? What does he say to her? Does she join him for a beer? Why has she come?

In my view, the only escape from Baudrillard’s world of the simulacra, of copies without originals, of representations without realities, is to ignore The Reality and to create this particular reality. Instead of seeing a world overwhelmed by more and more of the same, you find – or you create – a formless void where nothing exists except pure unprecedented possibility. Are there any formless voids left in a world inundated by mass-produced simulacra of everything under the sun? From forty thousand feet, no. But right here, right now, the guy at his café table rises to greet the woman. He bumps his leg on the table, sloshing just a little of the beer out of his glass, but neither of them notices. The man reaches out to take the woman’s extended hand as the waiter stands by the open door of the café, empty tray in hand, watching the motorcycle as it splashes its way between the double-parked cars toward the sea…




  1. By implication, from 40,000 feet all churches look alike. Do you try to make your church fit with what people expect a church to be, yet also make it stand out as exceptional in a crowded field? Or do you put yourself in the middle of your particular church and create without regard for standards or expectations or market niche? I’m for Plan B. The question is: will anybody come to a Plan B church?


    Comment by ktismatics — 4 October 2006 @ 8:29 am

  2. If I were you I might consider having the man bump the table, but he only jostles it a bit and doesn’t spill anything….That will make your novel truly stand out!

    9 What has been will be again,
    what has been done will be done again;
    there is nothing new under the sun.

    10 Is there anything of which one can say,
    “Look! This is something new”?
    It was here already, long ago;
    it was here before our time.

    11 There is no remembrance of men of old,
    and even those who are yet to come
    will not be remembered
    by those who follow.


    Comment by Jonathan Erdman — 4 October 2006 @ 3:24 pm

  3. This was the spirit of Ecclesiastes that Baudrillard was capturing in his “quote” from the prior post: everything is just a copy, and it’s been that way for so long it’s impossible to recognize the original any more. It’s an irony of the modern marketplace: despite the enormous variety of its product offerings, it always seems to reproduce more and more copies of the same thing.


    Comment by ktismatics — 5 October 2006 @ 2:15 am

  4. In my view, the only escape from Baudrillard’s world of the simulacra, of copies without originals, of representations without realities, is to ignore The Reality and to create this particular reality.

    Would it not also be possible to escape the simulacra through direct encounter with God?

    We seem to put up many symbols and idols to represent the Holy One, but to encounter him directly seems to be an escape from simulacra and to directly encounter the original and authentic: The Reality.


    Comment by Jonathan Erdman — 5 October 2006 @ 3:10 pm

  5. My main agenda is ktismatics rather than epistemology. Here I’m thinking mostly about creating something unprecedented in a world full of replicas and knockoffs. In what way does a direct encounter with God — if such a thing is even possible — lead me toward creating something unprecedented?

    Even if we’re talking about truth, about getting behind representation to reality, a direct encounter with God might “only” reveal truths that have been around forever. Is that enough? Does direct encounter obviate the need for the continued quest for truth? Or does God create new and different truths all the time? If so, can we have direct access to them?


    Comment by ktismatics — 5 October 2006 @ 6:58 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: